This Thread Blows - C19 and beyond

Let's use your logic for the 2019 flu season: 168,000 lab diagnosed cases, 34,000 deaths = 20% infection mortality rate!

don't be silly - that is not my logic. i already assume there are undiagnosed cases - it looks like a factor of 5-7?
if all those are highly clustered in the low susceptibility group, then the overall mortality rate is not accurately
represented by dividing by overall deaths by 5-7.
I do understand that it is what it is (deaths/totals) - but we are artificially minimizing contact to the at-risk group.
I think that is the point i was pushing - and just blue skying, i guess vaccines (ie flu vaccines) do the same thing,
protect the at risk.

(link to cdc in article)


1609281615669.png

108M are 50+ -> 80M 50-69
28M are over 70 - https://www.infoplease.com/us/population/population-65-years-and-over-age-1990-2000-and-2010

so for 200M it is just about zero
for 80M it is .05%
for 28M is is 5.4 %

there was no co-morbidity table. which we've seen is highly correlated.

kinda stark -
 
  • Like
Reactions: don
What?!? Site one study that confirms this nonsense. McRibs are AWESOME. Now this thread has really gone to shit. I don't care, ban me if you have to @Patrick but this guy's a jerk.

😉

Sorry Antonio - the McRib sucks. well compared to real ribs.....see who smoke their meat thread ! 😀
 
don't be silly - that is not my logic.

Of course it was, at least yesterday: "It's killed 17/1000 of the people that caught it although we could double the
number of people who caught it because it makes us feel better, so 8/1000."
if all those are highly clustered in the low susceptibility group, then the overall mortality rate is not accurately
represented by dividing by overall deaths by 5-7.

That's the way most diseases work, the "at risk" will have a higher chance of dying.
 
Of course it was, at least yesterday: "It's killed 17/1000 of the people that caught it although we could double the
number of people who caught it because it makes us feel better, so 8/1000."


That's the way most diseases work, the "at risk" will have a higher chance of dying.

damn, we are in the same group.

ps - i don't feel like calculating the weighted average up there.
 
How does this compare to a flu shot? You can get the vaccine but still get the flu and pass it around, just a lower chance of dying?

this is actually interesting. the idea is the corona virus vaccine is a vaccine to take care of multiple variants.
the flu vaccine picks the most likely strains to spread, and it is specific to them.
very cool.

neither are 100% effective - so there is that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: don
this is actually interesting. the idea is the corona virus vaccine is a vaccine to take care of multiple variants.
the flu vaccine picks the most likely strains to spread, and it is specific to them.
very cool.

neither are 100% effective - so there is that.
Yeah that’s kind of my point, not sure what difference it makes or how long it even lasts. We shall see.
 
Back
Top Bottom