Ok, so back to the point about cross. The Heckler has a lot of good points but you guys are more or less over that whole discussion because too much time has passed. Jeff tries to make a point, specifically this:
"How serious can we take a bike race that involves bacon and beer hand ups, gratuitous mud/sand/ etc, and turns for the sake of turns."
First of all, it's the back of the classes that take the beer & bacon hand-ups. You know what mountain bike racing would be with beer & bacon hand-ups? MORE FUN! And all the people taking the hand-ups would be the middle/lower pack of the classes. The top would be the same guys, doing the same thing. As for mud/sand & turns, that's an odd point. We ride mountain bikes over rocks & logs & roots as a total gratuitous exercise. People who build trails intentionally do that, put the trails over rocks and logs and such. And mud, you're going to say that no MTB races are in mud? You might have a point with sand. But the same would apply to mud in mountain biking.
I think also what's more is that there are world level cross racers competing in the Tour. Like it or hate it, it's a legit sport with world class athletes in it. Just because you think it makes slightly more sense than playing darts doesn't make it so.
On that note, think long & hard about the replay rules in baseball. Then compare them with the handful of rules in cross. Baseball in itself wins some sort of absurdity award when you think about the game as a whole.
Ok, I do think Utah touches on valid point here:
"The fact that to really be serious about cross requires more time, bike work, money, gluing tubulars, pit bikes, 4 sets of wheels, bringing trainers to bike races, barricades in your yard, JOGGING, practice shouldering a bike....it can really get nuts."
This isn't unfair. But anything worth doing is worth overdoing, right? As people ride bikes more and get in shape more, they realize the strongest & most competitive classes are in cross races. So if you want to compete with the most strong people, you race cross. Look at the MAC class I race in. On any day there are some guys who might come in 10th or might come in 40th. That's hard to find anywhere else.
So to the people who embrace that, it's worth it to do all of those things. I'm not really 1 of those guys. I don't jog, I refuse to shoulder the bike because I don't think it's really much faster in the long run. I get the money & tubular point that Utah makes. Trust me, nobody can relate more than me after last year. But then, I remember 1 race at KVSP a few years back where I sliced up an Ignitor on the first lap. A brand new one, so $60 or whatever pissed away right there.
If cost is an issue I think we may all be in the wrong sport. We need to take up chess.
Pit Bikes
Utah more or less nails this one with his description I think. I think the best road to a pit bike is the one where you buy a crappy cross bike, realize you love the sport, buy a real one, and have a de facto pit bike from there. My pit bike has saved my bacon numerous times. In fact, I have done Nittany 5 times ever and have had 4 mechanicals there. 3 of them I used the pit bike to keep racing. Once I did not have a pit bike. I have used it other times but Nittany seems to somehow be the place I exercise it the most.
Jeremy does bring up a point, though I did once run like 8 minutes to the pit to get my bike. That was last year, and my goal was to catch at least 1 guy. I did, eventually catch a few. But it may have been better to call it a day and come back on Sunday. Oh yeah, that was Nittany.
I was also once in 2nd in a NJ 40+ race when I blew my chain. It took every ounce of effort to not throw the bike as far as I could. In the end I calmly collected myself and walked back to the car, directly. At some point I heard Joe Sailing wondering on the mic where I had gone.
I do not think you need to practice shouldering, or running. I do not think you need to bring a trainer. I do not think you need a pit bike, or an extra set of wheels. The first full year I raced cross, I had a heavy ass Fuji bike with a set of tubulars. I paid less than $1000 for the whole setup. I went to cross practice at CR most Wednesdays and I raced hard on the weekends. I was in the NJ series that year and ended up 3rd overall in the B class. After that, I got better bikes, which are more fragile, and I break them all the time now. My point is, you don't need a lot of money to do this. And you don't have to buy into the religion to do this, and do it well. I didn't have any of those bells & whistles. I had a big engine and could handle a bike.
That's all you really, really need.
Finally
Think about what you probably like riding the most, in order, just for fun:
1. The trails
2. The road
3. In a grass field
This sort of suggests, at least to me, that the discipline that it makes the MOST sense to race is #3. Take the thing that's the least fun and add a shit-ton of awesome to it. I do actually enjoy racing mountain bikes too, but it makes the least sense to take the thing you enjoy most and drape a race over it. I'm not saying we shouldn't do it. But if we're going to get logical let's at least put everything under the microscope.
Anyway, I know that I just wasted a bunch of time here because the people who like cross will still like it and agree with me and the people who don't like it will ignore everything I said and hyper-focus on 1 or 2 things that don't seem to make sense. Maybe tomorrow we can discuss the Palestinian situation?