then there is the programming - this isn't hard, cause you just record it when it happens, and it can be reproduced elsewhere.
What exactly is this "it" you're trying to record?
then there is the programming - this isn't hard, cause you just record it when it happens, and it can be reproduced elsewhere.
If we could replicate the known universe on a computer, which will one day be possible, we could replicate it in real time, feeding in the changes in real time. After the computer performs a learning process from the data it could with some level of accuracy predict what will happen
I would think there would be a ceremony where you shed your body. (hmm, sound familiar?)
----
You see @rick81721, you are thinking in linear time, and not geometric. if i was to render something just 2 years ago, it would take twice the time as today. not just cpu, but the ability to store and access the amount of data.
)
Nah the problem is far too immense. We haven't even figured out yet how to cure all cancers and that is an infintessimally small sliver of the problem you are facing.
which one - the VR problem of triggering a synapse?
or the recording of one's self?
the latter being infinitely harder, but not a large infinity, one of the smaller ones - like the number of primes, vs the number of odd numbers, vs all whole numbers, vs all real numbers....(uh oh, the concept of different infinities! #boom and for @Norm #mindblown)
We were supposed to be flying around in jet cars by now, with every house having a robot maid:
I always get a kick out of these accelerated technological advance predictions. Let's figure out how to do something simple like mass-produce a fully functional humanoid robot for a few thousand bucks before thinking we can replicate the universe in 30 years
The brain already records this "it". These people are looking for a way to transfer it and/or store it beyond a person's life. I think there is also an assumption here that a person's soul (spirit if you will) is captured by the brain.
you don't need to replicate the known universe, you only need to draw it from the memories of the minds that have been digitized.......
once you have enough, you'll have everything.
Does this mean we can never go beyond what the original creators of this simulation knew of the universe?
would that not be a paradox?Does this mean we can never go beyond what the original creators of this simulation knew of the universe?
Last night, I was doing a typical weeknight ride in Wissahickon and at one point I was riding along Forbidden Drive and glanced down at my Garmin and saw it instantly jump from about 13 miles to 18 then 19 and finally 20 miles before returning to normal recording. So I continued along on my ride, and when I got home and uploaded the ride, this is what I saw:
![]()
And my top speed was 401.1 mph for the ride.
So obviously what happened is that I slipped into a wormhole on Forbidden Drive and was teleported across a fold in time to just outside Camden in the middle of the Ben Franklin Bridge. I can't recall any of this, but I figure that's because my high rate of speed caused me to momentarily black out. Traveling through a wormhole will do that to a brother, you dig? When you consider it, "wormhole" is the only plausible explanation given the constraints - singlespeed, Valley Green, Camden -- I mean it practically borders on cliche. Because ... SCIENCE!!!!
ugh - get a roomba.
we don't need the whole universe. - here is something worse, we don't need the physical universe at all, we need to be able to realize imagination. how the f are we going to do that? since we can't record the imaginary experience from someone.
and i'm not on anything atm.
VR isn't about memory, it is about experiences "in the now" - probably need to let go of reality to experience it fully (The Matrix)
The whole digital brain thing is much more complicated than totally immersive VR. (see above)
anyway, record the nerve interactions as it experiences something real, then play it back (or adapt it to others.)
You seem to be realizing the complexity of the problem. The other aspect being ignored here is purpose. All research, product development, business, etc is governed by two principles, you need the ability to do something and a reason to do it. Let's assume by some miracle computers have advanced to the degree you suggest in 30 years. We could use this incredible technology to prevent all human diseases, to create amazing machines that allow us all to live fruitful lives, to clean up our environment and explore and colonize the galaxy. Or... we could use this technology so that humans could spend their entire lives never moving, never accomplishing anything, never contributing to society, living in little pods and imagining an entirely synthetic reality because.. why? It makes for a cool movie plot??
A long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away....
I'm not a NASA scientist, but is it possible the GPS satellite radio signals being broadcast to your Garmin were temporarily delayed/blocked and/or reflected by something flying overhead in such a way that the location/time triangulation/trilateration calculations put you in an altogether different space?
I'm guessing it was a black triangle - yep, aliens on flight path to Philadelphia.
ah, you would want to move in-and-out of this immersive state?
I say it will be totally addictive, and nobody will want to leave. it will be reality, because it will not be distinguishable from the physical reality.....
time for work!