hotsauce
Well-Known Member
Yeah I understand not being on anyone's server but cold storage in your own pocket doesn't cut it with the SEC from a fiduciary perspective. They require funds/managers/etc who own any financial asset on someone else's behalf to be subject to surprise custody exams or keep the assets with a qualified custodian.
Essentially a custodian is a disinterested party that meets pretty strict rules around internal controls over their processes and not allowing any other claims to the asset. You could tell two different people that the assets in cold storage are theirs and neither knows the wiser. They're an essential third party service provider to any financial firm in the developed and developing world. So the custodian keeps the assets in cold storage then they require consent from the custodian and the owner to move the assets. In liquid financial markets it's all automated these days.
I don't believe Coinbase has something on this scale. It's likely fine to use their digital wallet for the small amounts that any of us play with. They very well could tell you the key over the phone but that doesn't help move cryptocurrency towards a liquid, efficient market. The alternative procedure should come into play in an actual disaster, not just when there's too much load on the servers.
Any thoughts on 24/7 price movements? I think its a much bigger hurdle than custody.
Essentially a custodian is a disinterested party that meets pretty strict rules around internal controls over their processes and not allowing any other claims to the asset. You could tell two different people that the assets in cold storage are theirs and neither knows the wiser. They're an essential third party service provider to any financial firm in the developed and developing world. So the custodian keeps the assets in cold storage then they require consent from the custodian and the owner to move the assets. In liquid financial markets it's all automated these days.
I don't believe Coinbase has something on this scale. It's likely fine to use their digital wallet for the small amounts that any of us play with. They very well could tell you the key over the phone but that doesn't help move cryptocurrency towards a liquid, efficient market. The alternative procedure should come into play in an actual disaster, not just when there's too much load on the servers.
Any thoughts on 24/7 price movements? I think its a much bigger hurdle than custody.





