Middlebush Road Crossing

The road is eligible to receive federal funding, which is filtered through the NJDOT to the MPO’s, which is NJTPA, who facilitates working with the counties. So find the county rep and start process.

@w_b tons of liability associated with that cross walk, which is likely why it hasnt been done.

what would a pedestrian overpass cost? just ballpark.
 
IMG_4716.webp


I think it’s crazy there isn’t, at the very least, something like this painted on the road to give drivers a heads up/ reminder.

I mean really, how much could this cost?
 
If you think a pedestrian bridge is going to be expensive, I can’t imagine what a tunnel there would cost. Between excavating, closing the road, environmental studies because wetlands, & the lawyers.
It would probably flood after every heavy rainfall as well…
 
A tunnel is probably not feasible there.

1) It would be flooded all the time.
2) It would require massive road work, something only going to happen when the road is replaced and that recently happened.
3) There's likely existing utilities/storm-drain piping in that road.
 
If you think a pedestrian bridge is going to be expensive, I can’t imagine what a tunnel there would cost. Between excavating, closing the road, environmental studies because wetlands, & the lawyers.
It would probably flood after every heavy rainfall as well…
lets see how far we can get doing it ourselves first, would be a fun project
 
After @stb222's effort for improvement to signage on the road, they also added strange crosswalk markings.

Just some while rectangles, no edge or hash marks. I've seen this in other places - does it have a different connotation?
Here is the Google street view image. There are also "crossing ahead" signs 400m back in each direction.

1785262764614.webp


What I hadn't seen before is what the park added to the trail

1785262812339.webp


Oh, and I did go and take a look if a tunnel would work. Negative. 5' of clearance

1785262859198.webp
 
Don't the hash marks make it an official crosswalk that drivers are legally required to stop at for pedestrians now? The question is if a biker is considered a "pedestrian". I guess if you walk your bike across the road you'd have a case.
 
Don't the hash marks make it an official crosswalk that drivers are legally required to stop at for pedestrians now? The question is if a biker is considered a "pedestrian". I guess if you walk your bike across the road you'd have a case.
I think they might have to have a blinking light thing also for the crosswalk. Maybe that's why they didn't put any blinking things up. I myself would not at all believe they be stopping on that road.
 
After @stb222's effort for improvement to signage on the road, they also added strange crosswalk markings.

Just some while rectangles, no edge or hash marks. I've seen this in other places - does it have a different connotation?
Here is the Google street view image. There are also "crossing ahead" signs 400m back in each direction.

View attachment 286778

What I hadn't seen before is what the park added to the trail

View attachment 286780

Oh, and I did go and take a look if a tunnel would work. Negative. 5' of clearance

View attachment 286781

I think it the same meaning as all the different types of crosswalks, don't run over the things in them.

The parks stance on those trail signs was interesting at first because they basically said it isn't our problem. We all know if there was a vehicle/ped accident there that all parties, including the park, would be sued so im guessing they came to their senses.
 

Trail Conditions

Current Conditions

powered by Trailforks.com
Back
Top Bottom