trump vs hillary

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have an opposite experience working (4) trump buildings.

1) pro Union contractor
2) every trump job equaled unlimited over time
3) the man showed up regularly and thanked you for your services.

Like him or not, I feel you get what you see unlike the other polished turd.
 
HSqxKaB.jpg
 
Monkey Soup said:
And competent? Bit of a stretch there. What exactly has she achieved in the last decade, when she was actually empowered to do something? And she couldn't handle that little thing in Libya, so Isis better watch out now.
Click to expand...

Yes, competent. Clinton has been first lady, US senator, Sec of State. Obviously she has plenty of faults. But this is a binary choice. Trump, through his words and actions, has shown himself to be woefully unprepared to be president. Plus, his candidacy is built on fear, bigotry, and racism. I'm a Republican, but an American first, and Trump in the White House would be terrible for the country.
 
stilluf said:
Yes, competent. Clinton has been first lady, US senator, Sec of State. Obviously she has plenty of faults. But this is a binary choice. Trump, through his words and actions, has shown himself to be woefully unprepared to be president. Plus, his candidacy is built on fear, bigotry, and racism. I'm a Republican, but an American first, and Trump in the White House would be terrible for the country.
Click to expand...

So even though she failed miserably at those jobs, pulled a Mr. Blutarsky and achieved 0.0, she's qualified since she was basically just a warm body in those positions? This is exactly the same rationale that they use in corporate politics, promote someone to their highest level of incompetence. I'm sure this will all work much better though.
 
Monkey Soup said:
So even though she failed miserably at those jobs
Click to expand...

This is all just your opinion. If you're going to point to Benghazi please don't as the US has more blood on it's hands then four poor souls who were killed during this attack.

I'm not a HRC fanboy but will certainly vote for her over "The Donald" in any election.
 
Dominique said:
Can you provide data for this statement. I'm interested to see it.
Click to expand...
Libya
"we came, we saw, he died" was her quote while laughing. laughing about the death of the ruler of a sovereign nation by bayonet up the ass. Kinda rude if you ask me to laugh about that in public.
Now Libya is a completely failed state. This was her job/doing.
 
HRC use of a private server to avoid FOIA, the private meeting with the AG by Bill, the resulting FBI complete lack of integrity in everything surrounding the case, combined with the lack of separation between the Clinton foundation and the state dept. It is clear that the Clinton are nothing but power hungry criminals that will stop at nothing to keep power even if it is at the expense of the country. They represent everything that is wrong with Washington. They do not believe the laws apply to them
 
Seriously? The job of Secretary of State is to be the Presidents chief foreign affairs advisor, and to carry out, negotiate, and implement said policy. What you say the state of our foreign affairs are now? Any successes?

- Benghazi: congratulations, you've killed people before your even president.
- Russia: epic fail. And she will never get the time of day from them.
- Iran: epic fail. They get a 10yr timeout on developing nukes (like they ever stopped), oh and we paid for hostage release, with cash.
- Israel: epic fail. Relations are a bit frosty now.
- Arabian peninsul: kind of speaks for itself.
- coalition building: not even on the radar.
- China: we're still their bitches, and they're probably not done going through her emails, so I doubt she'd ever be in a position to negitiate from a position of power with them.
 
Supermoto said:
It is clear that the Clintons are nothing but power hungry criminals that will stop at nothing to keep power even if it is at the expense of the country. They represent everything that is wrong with Washington. They do not believe the laws apply to them
Click to expand...
I don't know if I'd go this far, but I can live with another Clinton given that the GOP couldn't provide an electable alternative. Clinton wouldn't have stood a chance.
 
ChrisRU said:
I don't know if I'd go this far, but I can live with another Clinton given that the GOP couldn't provide an electable alternative. Clinton wouldn't have stood a chance.
Click to expand...

I can understand this sentiment, and for a brief time even entertained it myself. Take an analytical look, make 2 columns for each; crimes/damage already committed and impact vs. future risks, and this whole argument kind of falls apart. I think what she'll do scares me even more if you look at past "bad judgment".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom