Not sure which post(s) this is directed at, but IF it's at mine, I'll respond:So if I read this correctly according to some on here you can't dislike or disagree with what is going on today without being labeled a "Dumocrat" who can't do research?
You’re totally ignoring who did what here. I don’t care if the guy is a pedophile. He’s not the one that put our national security in danger. You think they should all get a pass because this journalist is biased?Really… so scum bag Robert Malley gets a buy because he was on the Biden abomination team and fake news media will not portray any negative narratives! Please do yourself a favor and look him up!
Get out of here with your common sense middle of the road approach.Don't know anything about the guy so this is more of a general statement than a direct one on this topic. The issue w/ journalism is bias, which has always existed! This ain't new, it's just now w/ the internet and immediacy of information availability it's more noticeable.
In this thread, multiple people have already repeated debunked information as if it was fact. The guy that continued repeating horse paste despite the facts around that. More recently, folks are parroting the fine people hoax, which was debunked as well: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
Snopes claims to be a non-biased organization, which I'll assume they are. Some have claimed they are left-leaning (I'm guessing conservatives?) but I'm not going down any research rabbit hole like that. I'm not aware of anyone accusing them of being right-leaning, and if that's true, I am only bringing that up to say if they aren't right-leaning, then there shouldn't be any agenda for them to falsely debunk the fine people hoax. And if someone actually listened to the full clip (or read a full transcript) instead of just sound bites that were specifically pulled to give the impression he said it, it's hard to come away believing he said what was claimed. (I'm not even gonna entertain the people who are gonna come back w/ "well we knew what he meant, he was just covering himself").
My point is when you get folks parroting what their favorite news outfit said w/o doing any independent research, and when you show them the error of their ways and they keep parroting, there is no discussion going on here; it's just people talking at each other, not comprehending each other and having a meaningful dialogue. It goes both ways of course, factually incorrect right leaning bias stories have the same problem of their consumers parroting them as well.
Don't get me wrong, there have been some good discussions here that were interesting. But that's why I've mostly tuned this thread out. There is so much deflecting, changing topic, repeating things that aren't true, and people putting words in other's mouths that were never said, etc.
In other words, standard anonymous internet behavior.
Yeah, fair, I guess I'm looking at it from my point of view. If I don't have enough info on a topic, I literally don't chime in. If all I know is what I've heard or read in the news and I haven't looked into it more to try and figure out how factual or twisted it is, I stay quiet. That's where I enjoy some of the civilized back and forth here, get to maybe learn something, or at least hear different perspectives to try and come to a better informed opinion.Get out of here with your common sense middle of the road approach.
In reality, who of us has enough time to sit on a daily basis and go into the weeds on each and every one of these topics to figure out the middle ground is between the two sides? You’re right there’s inherent bias in the press but that’s the best resource that most of us have.
But back to the big picture: At best, a politician is akin to a used car salesman telling you you’re getting a great deal on the car you’re about to buy. Probably some fuckery at play in more than one place. And theoretically, checks and balances across the branches of government provide some allowance for blissful ignorance to those of us who just wanna live our damn lives and not try to decode every political action. That last bit is what really feels to be under attack these days.
I will say there's been multiple times where I typed something out, thought twice about it, did a 2 second google and changed my mind because what I thought was the case was not. Very often we have a belief that's not founded in reality.Yeah, fair, I guess I'm looking at it from my point of view. If I don't have enough info on a topic, I literally don't chime in. If all I know is what I've heard or read in the news and I haven't looked into it more to try and figure out how factual or twisted it is, I stay quiet. That's where I enjoy some of the civilized back and forth here, get to maybe learn something, or at least hear different perspectives to try and come to a better informed opinion.
And I really try to only jump in when I feel I have useful context to provide to those who haven't dug in. Like you said, no one has the time to look into everything! So if I have looked into something, if I feel I have valuable facts to share, I feel like why not try and throw some knowledge out, can make us all better.
But when people dismiss it and keep repeating false narratives, well then they are responsible for that. It's quite alright to be ignorant (i.e. not know the facts), but it's another thing entirely to be presented facts and completely ignore them.
Can't he be both?View attachment 258173
I always wonder whether tRUMP's supporters like that he is a rapist or a racist?
Has nothing to do with/ my reply of course; yet another deflecting tangent. Thanks for playing.
So for the record answer the below…
1- was the mission completed?
2- was any US service members killed or in any danger?
3- did it stop the targeting of shipping?
4- did it put Iran on notice… you bet!
So it’s a win..!
Unlike the past administration (what a joke!) The withdraw from Kabul that killed 13 US service members! And sleepy Joe kept looking at his watch at the memorial of the planes arrival….you got to be kidding!! that administration was the worst ever!
He will liberate us from our money...So, is everyone excited about liberation day?
![]()
Trump's 11th week in office set to focus on tariffs as president touts 'Liberation Day'
President Donald Trump is set to roll out his massive tariff plan on April 2, which he has touted as "Liberation Day in America."www.foxnews.com
This is the tariff thread. This going to pretty much shut down most industries that are assembly based. Between that and the government staff reduction's the monthly jobs reports will not be released because they are going to stunningly bad….. thoughts?
Where did I claim the first sentence? Willing to correct or clarify myself if I did, but I'm not recalling making such a claim.Kinda thought that you were trying to disprove the hypothesis that tRUMP is racist and his association with a Christian nationalist, violent band of thugs might be related.
You mentioned above that this is an anonymous message board, but I have ridden with @Mtbdog, a much better technical rider than me, @Johnny Utah (beating him in Marty's FAT FIFTY was one of the most fun days on a bike) and I believe I lent Captain B his first fat bike for a quick spin.
I have ridden with 10 or 20 others from both sides and will continue to do so. Everybody on the block no my nickname.
So the Proud Boys are what exactly then if not Pro White Male, anti everything else? Please educate me on what they do that is good for the country.Lol yeah the racist Proud Boys with their Afro-Cuban leader Enrique Tarrio.
I don't believe snopes is accurate, he clearly stated there were "fine people" on both sides. If you read the link you provided:In this thread, multiple people have already repeated debunked information as if it was fact. The guy that continued repeating horse paste despite the facts around that. More recently, folks are parroting the fine people hoax, which was debunked as well: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
In other words, standard anonymous internet behavior.