wonderturtle
Well-Known Member
cycling: baggy or tight?
Only way to fly!
no spandex please.
After wearing tights for a few years, I tried a nice pair of fox shorts....
Baggies suck, sorry. In this case, I'll go function over fashion.
Of course if you idea of a ride is spending the majority of your time bullshitting in the trail head parking lot, then I guess baggies are fine. But if you're planning on 2-3 hours of actually riding, stick with the tights.
After wearing tights for a few years, I tried a nice pair of fox shorts....
Baggies suck, sorry. In this case, I'll go function over fashion.
Of course if you idea of a ride is spending the majority of your time bullshitting in the trail head parking lot, then I guess baggies are fine. But if you're planning on 2-3 hours of actually riding, stick with the tights.
Other then the obvious "I don't want to wear tights" there's not a single advantage to wearing baggies.
On a super tech trail? The last thing I want is to get hung up on baggies and go otb. Its happened.
there's not a single advantage to wearing men's underpants.
Women's underpants are so comfortable
Other then the obvious "I don't want to wear tights" there's not a single advantage to wearing baggies.
Ninety degrees and humid? Who the hell wants to wear wet shorts? Tights are so much more comfortable and cooler.
On a super tech trail? The last thing I want is to get hung up on baggies and go otb. Its happened.
Other then the obvious "I don't want to wear tights" there's not a single advantage to wearing baggies.