This is slowly turning into a head butting religous battle...2 things you don't talk to friends about are religion and politics. This thread I feel started with good intent but I am surprised it has made it this far. I am not against religion and I went through communion and all that but I have never been one to believe in something I can't see.
nah - we are doing great. No personal attacks.
as a matter of fact, it hasn't been too much about 'religion' and more about 'is there a god?' -
"i can't believe in ... because ...."
is how one makes an argument. This is a healthy discussion, and how one should make their points.
One can counter, with their beliefs, or premise.
like this.
I'm not one to debate politics or religion. I'm surprised that every church I've walked into hasn't burst into flames.
While raised Catholic and yes celebrating Christmas, it's hard for me to believe anything. This is mostly because my life in engineering and understanding of the sciences make it hard to believe that *poof* something happened. I stick to math and physical proof, but when my 92 year old grandma says she prays for me, she gets the answer she wants.
There is no proof God does not exist either. Again, i am not in the god camp, but there is no proof either way.
and your concern about how grandma feels (empathy) and your reaction, is one tenant of religion.
So one can accept the social framework, without believing. How are we going to teach that in the future, without the god part, cause it seems "right" ????
As
@pooriggy has mentioned, and
@clarkenstein, the old testament is a combination of stories, and interpretations. Are the divinely inspired?, idunno. They taught us that in catholic school 30 years ago.
(new testament, is word of god - per church, see previous post)
Believing in evolution, per
@rick81721 , does not exclude god - again, the concept that god lives outside the time-space, has coined the term intelligent design. or maybe god subscribes to chaos theory?
Here's an interesting idea.
if you were a gambling person, believing in god, and the rewards that come with it, would trump not believing and just ending.
only because of the comparative opportunity costs. for those that don't steal, murder, etc....doing it wouldn't be that far of a shift.
(this is not my argument, it is Pascal's)
@StayHydrated - the weak part of the argument for contact (not existence) is the time dimension. if we are a point on the cosmic timeline, then it approaches impossible for another point
to overlap (see concept of irrational numbers) - it is that simple. say the human capability of writing has existed for 5000 years - radio reception for 125 - do you think we are going to last
another 10,000? doubt it. That is a small window.