What I'm after is a more literal reading of the theorem as written, so that (24) is read:
F sub mag equals the sum of nabla times b times b over mu sub 0
which is as literal as possible. I use this site a lot when looking for a way to express this stuff aloud.
deez dash nutsYou could either say "dee z
What I'm after is a more literal reading of the theorem as written, so that (24) is read:
F sub mag equals the sum of nabla times b times b over mu sub 0
which is as literal as possible. I use this site a lot when looking for a way to express this stuff aloud.
That's a good call. This is where my ignorance meets the road. I just sound like I know what I'm doing...F sub mag equals the sum of nabla cross b cross b over mu sub 0
And here, I'd go a third way: "Delta z over Delta x", simply because in this case I'm reading vs. interpreting. And I'm lazy.take for example:
You could either say "dee z divided by dee x", or "partial z divided by partial x" but it's a lot easier to understand it as "partial derivative of z with respect to x"
but i believe that X is denoting cross products not multiplication
cross product (cross)
Gotcha. Found "dee" in my cheat sheet. Thanks for the heads-up.In that case, ∂ is not δ.
Unofficial official backup plan if/when Rutgers sucks and doesn't come through @seanrunnetteHey @StayHydrated - just write out the equations in words, and @seanrunnette can read it.
i'm a idea guy.
Oh my effing god: