icolquhoun
Active Member
I personally approach this from two angles: as a small scale low impact loggin' nut with a portable sawmill and deep understanding of biology and ecology, and leaning very heavily left on all things environmental, owning no TV, commuting by bike, and having a McKibben tatoo (some of the above were jokes, the TV was not one of them), I fail to see this benefiting anyone but the "commercial loggers"...(not loggers, they make dick)
Also, how is this COSTING the state 2.7million to implement?
Every state that has logging as a large part of their resident's incomes leases state and federal land to paper or wood producing companies and turns a decent profit.
Like the quasi moratorium on fracking
Like the bill to allow other state's fracking jizz to be poured in our landfills
Like the clearcuts being done across wayway, ringwood, high point,and the entire northern part of the state, including over mOnksville res and countless small natural streams
Like the Roseland transmission lines thru a freekin national park and half the northern part of the state.
If this goes out to a Weyerhauser or other large company, expect almost everything in their path to be destroyed, including trails!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Also, how is this COSTING the state 2.7million to implement?
Every state that has logging as a large part of their resident's incomes leases state and federal land to paper or wood producing companies and turns a decent profit.
Like the quasi moratorium on fracking
Like the bill to allow other state's fracking jizz to be poured in our landfills
Like the clearcuts being done across wayway, ringwood, high point,and the entire northern part of the state, including over mOnksville res and countless small natural streams
Like the Roseland transmission lines thru a freekin national park and half the northern part of the state.
If this goes out to a Weyerhauser or other large company, expect almost everything in their path to be destroyed, including trails!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited: