onetracker
Well-Known Member
This is a really interesting discussion and we can learn lessons from the ongoing KT experiment.
In reality, it is probably probably a mixture of money, congestion, tensions, control, loss of control. KT has changed alot since my first trip to the area in 2003 or 2004 and not all for the better.
I would probably still visit but spend more time in Rutland, Millstone, Killington and GMT than I would normally spend. So it would be a different kind of trip. I spent 2 weeks in VT camping in my van and riding this year. With a shrinking KTA network, it would probably be more like a week with a few days at KTA.
The economics are interesting. First, the property taxes are not as cheap as you would think. So KTA would need to explore a limited land use deal if they buy the property to lower the potential tax burden. Plus property values in East Burke only (not nearly as much in surrounding towns) have escalated significantly as of late. KTA has been buying property so that seems in the cards. I think most landowners up that way are generous but the Victory Hill situation, with a landowner trying to profit from trail access could change the mentality.
I would definitely pay more for a trail pass to get the trails in question back. Historically, I have always bought the season pass in order to support the KTA. But in talking to visitors over the years, many people resent paying access fees to the extent that they would ride in other places to avoid paying the fees. There are alot of new destination places to ride these days. Those trail closures would put a major dent in the Burke VT local economy.
Some places that could benefit from increased tourism from the Northeast: other VT places mentioned above, Brevard, Stokesville, Roanoke, Bentonville, Raystown/State College, Davis WV. We shall see...Hopefully E Burke can broker a solution before Spring; fingers crossed.
In reality, it is probably probably a mixture of money, congestion, tensions, control, loss of control. KT has changed alot since my first trip to the area in 2003 or 2004 and not all for the better.
I would probably still visit but spend more time in Rutland, Millstone, Killington and GMT than I would normally spend. So it would be a different kind of trip. I spent 2 weeks in VT camping in my van and riding this year. With a shrinking KTA network, it would probably be more like a week with a few days at KTA.
The economics are interesting. First, the property taxes are not as cheap as you would think. So KTA would need to explore a limited land use deal if they buy the property to lower the potential tax burden. Plus property values in East Burke only (not nearly as much in surrounding towns) have escalated significantly as of late. KTA has been buying property so that seems in the cards. I think most landowners up that way are generous but the Victory Hill situation, with a landowner trying to profit from trail access could change the mentality.
I would definitely pay more for a trail pass to get the trails in question back. Historically, I have always bought the season pass in order to support the KTA. But in talking to visitors over the years, many people resent paying access fees to the extent that they would ride in other places to avoid paying the fees. There are alot of new destination places to ride these days. Those trail closures would put a major dent in the Burke VT local economy.
Some places that could benefit from increased tourism from the Northeast: other VT places mentioned above, Brevard, Stokesville, Roanoke, Bentonville, Raystown/State College, Davis WV. We shall see...Hopefully E Burke can broker a solution before Spring; fingers crossed.