It is a work in progress, but you don't need to shut up. You have the power to add a park, everyone does right now. I understand the learning curve may be a bit steep. We just wanted to get the major parks taken care of first. Everything beyond this set is a secondary park, not so much a destination with a few exceptions.
We're discussing the park GPS locations. I'm not sure what is more beneficial to you. A list of "lat, long, parkName" or a single kml/gpx file. Personally I use my car GPS to navigate to park entrances so a list I could print out and enter would work better. But I guess a kml is better for you?