 
	Point well made. The issue I am experiencing is front end plow. My prior front tire was a cheap Conti wire tire and stuck like glue only problem is I could not use it when I converted to tubeless due to the weak sidewalls. I ride mostly rocky technical terrain and figure it would help traction in the turns (I also ride snow) if I go to a 2.6 as I do not care about weight . The ardent is marketed as a do all tire and got rave reviews. I should have known better as nothing does it all. As a rear tire it is fine as it spins easy and tracks good enough. Great tire just does not work for me. I was thinking of the tire choices you proposed as they are on my list.Curious, why do you want a wider tire? I would try a Conti Trail King 2.4, those are "big" 2.4's. I currently run a Nobby Nic, and they are not as durable as Maxxis. I would ditch the Ardent and try the Conti or a Minion/High Roller II combo (Minion rear, HR II Front), those are some meaty tires. I would limit how big a tire your running because 29'er wheels are heavy enough. If you really want to go beyond 2.4, I'd get wider rims, but not wider than 30mm, which seems to be the point of diminishing returns:
http://enve.com/journal/is-wider-always-better/
Wow, I actually love the ardent 2.4s. I race with the ardent race or crossroads 2 . I use the 2.4s for rocky or loose terrain races like tomorrow at erie 80. I weigh 210 or so now and find the ardent has superior grip. I love it everywhere from hartshorne to cr to jungle. I use the exo tr version and run about 16-20 psi depending on conditions. I think it is an excellent tire if running rigid and the set I have now has been through many hell rides at cr with one tiny sidewall puncture while hammering down yellow rigid. Carbon wheels help keep everything stiff too.Point well made. The issue I am experiencing is front end plow. My prior front tire was a cheap Conti wire tire and stuck like glue only problem is I could not use it when I converted to tubeless due to the weak sidewalls. I ride mostly rocky technical terrain and figure it would help traction in the turns (I also ride snow) if I go to a 2.6 as I do not care about weight . The ardent is marketed as a do all tire and got rave reviews. I should have known better as nothing does it all. As a rear tire it is fine as it spins easy and tracks good enough. Great tire just does not work for me. I was thinking of the tire choices you proposed as they are on my list.
I know, so many people swear by the Ardents, I was on the fence about even mentioning the issue. Everyone that has tried my bike has experienced the same front end plow. Other things come into play, maybe my seat is set up too high or the stem too short. However when I had the cheapo wire Conti's there were no traction issues. I'm not a racer and certainly no expert, I just love to ride. I never heard of someone running 29er tires at 16 pounds (still learning about this stuff) I think I will at least drop it down to 18 pounds for my Ringwood ride tomorrow and see how it works. Thanks.Wow, I actually love the ardent 2.4s. I race with the ardent race or crossroads 2 . I use the 2.4s for rocky or loose terrain races like tomorrow at erie 80. I weigh 210 or so now and find the ardent has superior grip. I love it everywhere from hartshorne to cr to jungle. I use the exo tr version and run about 16-20 psi depending on conditions. I think it is an excellent tire if running rigid and the set I have now has been through many hell rides at cr with one tiny sidewall puncture while hammering down yellow rigid. Carbon wheels help keep everything stiff too.
I run bontrager rhythm pros 22.5 inner width. At hartshorne(fast hard pack) I run 20ish psi. At places like cr I run 18-19 and jungle I will run 16(low speed tech stuff where traction helps). I tried 16 at hartshorne and got rollover on the fast descents. Fat bikes teach you alot about pressure.I know, so many people swear by the Ardents, I was on the fence about even mentioning the issue. Everyone that has tried my bike has experienced the same front end plow. Other things come into play, maybe my seat is set up too high or the stem too short. However when I had the cheapo wire Conti's there were no traction issues. I'm not a racer and certainly no expert, I just love to ride. I never heard of someone running 29er tires at 16 pounds (still learning about this stuff) I think I will at least drop it down to 18 pounds for my Ringwood ride tomorrow and see how it works. Thanks.
Those drop offs at Hartshorne are a blast. Good luck at the race tomorrow.I run bontrager rhythm pros 22.5 inner width. At hartshorne(fast hard pack) I run 20ish psi. At places like cr I run 18-19 and jungle I will run 16(low speed tech stuff where traction helps). I tried 16 at hartshorne and got rollover on the fast descents. Fat bikes teach you alot about pressure.
Thanks. It would be totally cool to see a carbon reinforced sidewall where you can run 10 psi for traction but it feels like 20 when turningThose drop offs at Hartshorne are a blast. Good luck at the race tomorrow.
I'd disagree with Conti tires...maybe on paper they look good but the three I have run and many others i see completely blow apart. I hade teo sidewalls and an entire tread blow out...junky.
