rick81721
Lothar
I understand the OP’s frustration but it’s always a great practice to question your own convictions. Had those extra steps been taken then perhaps the OP might have come to the conclusion Norm and Matty did.
As for ragging... Implying people can’t read when they clearly can is ragging
Don't understand your first paragraph. What convictions? What extra steps? The dog owner was clearly 100% at fault in this incident. Anyone who watches Judge Judy knows she would have ripped them a new one and found for the plaintiff