Tire widths

Thin Diesel

Well-Known Member
I've seen people report their bike setup has different width front and rear tires (i.e. 2.3" front, 2.1" back). Some are wider in front others wider in back. What are the pros and cons?


Fourth Party
Bigger in front usually is for better cornering traction, while a smaller rear makes pedaling a little easier. Everyone's tire set ups are personal preference, just like a seat. There really is no rule of thumb, run what works for you.

The Kalmyk

Well-Known Member
FYI...Some tire companies measure casing and some measure tread...

Example: Conti measures tread and Schwalbe measures casing


Well-Known Member
Correct me if im wrong, But I think that running skinny tires would be better on smoother trails. And a fatter tire for rocky and muddy trails. That way you absorb the bouncing on rocks with the extra tire area touching the ground. And also with skinnyer tires would have less rolling resistance.


Active Member
I had a friend that raced BMX pretty seriously and he said that wider front tire/skinnier rear tire was the thing to do. It supposedly was faster. I've sometimes done it this way in homage to him.


New Member
I run a Specialized FastTracks 2.0 in the rear and a Spec. Roll-x 2.0 up front. They're both folding, aarmid bead so they're pretty light. The rear has pretty low knobs and rolls super quick, and the front is a bit more aggressive, to make up for the lack of width, and works great in looser soil and on roots. I run smaller tires because I commute on this bike as well as ride trails, so it really helps to keep the rolling resistance to a minimum. I keep them at 76 psi. around New Brunswick, and drop them to 38 once I reach the trail. Has been working pretty well for me.

Top Bottom