The Kalmyk's Tinfoil Hat Happy Hour (aka Most Useless Thread on MTBNJ)

1DB9C56C-2FA8-4191-8D28-46A4D3CA3EFE.jpeg
 
Patrick said:
Tesla - cause he was right, but didn't have the resources to convince the decision makers.

www.endesa.com

Tesla versus Edison: the conflict that gave us alternating current

Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison are two of the greatest inventors in history. They were fierce rivals when it came to their respective electricity delivery systems.
www.endesa.com www.endesa.com
Click to expand...

Einstein, Curie and Hawking were wrong? I'd pick Curie - the only chemist and only person to win a Nobel in two disciplines.
 
Pagliacci said:
When my uncle was giving me life lessons in the seventies (I had the best dad in the world, but he wasn't "cool" like Uncle Bart), he told me: "French college chicks, no matter what they look like, are at least a seven; they will teach you shit you never even thought of"
Click to expand...

What about Polish chicks?
 
rick81721 said:
Scam

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit...lass-action-settlement-reached-sports-drinks/
Click to expand...

Scam? What is this being held to RICO law standards? 😂

Without details i wouldn’t jump to a catch all conclusion. And btw, you should know this, if a company is producing a product that people ingest, class action law suits are not always a black swan event for a company. Talking to a prudent thinker like yourself, im sure you can see there is a hole in you calling out Scam😜😜
 
Last edited:
The Kalmyk said:
Scam? What is this being held to RICO law standards? 😂

Without details i wouldn’t jump to a catch all conclusion. And btw, you should know this, if a company is producing a product that people ingest, class action law suits are not always a black swan event for a company. Talking to a prudent thinker like yourself, im sure you can see there is a hole in you calling out Scam😜😜
Click to expand...

It's a scam because the scientific proof that it works is flawed/nonexistent. Plus as a biochemist, the notion that there is something magical about cooked corn starch is nonsense.
 
rick81721 said:
It's a scam because the scientific proof that it works is flawed/nonexistent. Plus as a biochemist, the notion that there is something magical about cooked corn starch is nonsense.
Click to expand...

What scientific proof are you referencing? What is the process of said cooked corn? If you’re going to play the position of authority at least let me know at what capacity have you worked with high resistant starches. I dont think you have enough experience with it to make a claim😜😜

Hi maize 260 is sold in tons across the globe but i had to ask my buddy what category its being sold into.
 
Last edited:
The Kalmyk said:
What scientific proof are you referencing? What is the process of said cooked corn? If you’re going to play the position of authority at least let me know at what capacity have you worked with high resistant starches. I dont think you have enough experience with it to make a claim😜😜

Hi maize 260 is sold in tons across the globe but i had to ask my buddy what category its being sold into.
Click to expand...

Good point - I checked further into the lawsuit and UCAN main response was "our claims aren't based on science". There you go!
 
The Kalmyk said:
Yeah i wonder what their products taste like though😉😂

Ingredion product is backed by science.
Click to expand...

Ha I had an interview with the National Starch R&D center in Bridgewater (which is now Ingredion) in 1984 but bagged it after interviewing with Colgate-Palmolive first and taking their offer.
 
rick81721 said:
Ha I had an interview with the National Starch R&D center in Bridgewater (which is now Ingredion) in 1984 but bagged it after interviewing with Colgate-Palmolive first and taking their offer.
Click to expand...


Nice! My buddy started there when it was National Starch in sales. He is still there and so is the R&D.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom