Pampa
Well-Known Member
I started looking into this when trying to estimate how long I could go on a bikepacking route each day with a similar level of effort and riding time. Looking at the relationship between miles done and feet climbed I worked out a (non-scientific) basic formula to calculate the effort level of a segment: Difficulty = miles + ft/mi The units obviously don't match so I just call the result "points". Below is an example.
Anyone knows another way of looking at this?
I'm now looking at another application of this "metric". I started a training program and I'm curious about how I'm doing versus several other times that I attempted more or less the same training, so I created sort of virtual racers out of past training data and I'm comparing how I'm doing vs previous "versions of me". The two most important metrics I compare are accumulated mi/hr (total time) and ft/hr (tot time). The thing is that I don't know if I'm doing better or not because the rides are different. For example, I'm doing better than a virtual racer on mi/hr but at a lower ft/mi and with another one I'm going slower but doing more ft/hr, so how can I get to a unifying/combined number that I can use to determine if I'm doing better or not? One option would be calculating the number I calculated above for the distance of each virtual rider but I don't know if that means anything really.
Any ideas?
Anyone knows another way of looking at this?
I'm now looking at another application of this "metric". I started a training program and I'm curious about how I'm doing versus several other times that I attempted more or less the same training, so I created sort of virtual racers out of past training data and I'm comparing how I'm doing vs previous "versions of me". The two most important metrics I compare are accumulated mi/hr (total time) and ft/hr (tot time). The thing is that I don't know if I'm doing better or not because the rides are different. For example, I'm doing better than a virtual racer on mi/hr but at a lower ft/mi and with another one I'm going slower but doing more ft/hr, so how can I get to a unifying/combined number that I can use to determine if I'm doing better or not? One option would be calculating the number I calculated above for the distance of each virtual rider but I don't know if that means anything really.
Any ideas?




