Sidewinder is a year closer to retirement. We rode everything except the ski hill.How are conditions so far this year? Wet or dry Spring?
Sidewinder is a year closer to retirement.
It is not nearly in good shape as it’s been in years past. Their turns are good. The trail has lots of roots and cracks in the flow. It works fine, but eventually they need to fix the flow. To today’s standards it is still a great ride and so classically known they will do what they need to.Explain this...
Do you need a pass for VH?Victory Hill is open again, definitely worth the drive over
Yes, sounds like you can get one at the trail head or they have an address where you can grab one on the FB pageDo you need a pass for VH?
Didn’t realize there were other trails than KT.Yes, sounds like you can get one at the trail head or they have an address where you can grab one on the FB page
I checked out some of the history of Victory Hill, interesting struggle between the land owners/managers/trail builders and the state over whether the trails are an "improvement" and thus subject to the onerous VT development law known as Act 250. Seems like there was at one time an intent by KTA to adopt the Victory trails, but they backed off after the Act 250 issue was raised. The state determined that the Act did apply, and the trails must be closed until Act 250 approval was obtained. Looks like the issue is in the courts now, and the trails are open (for now).
The take-away for me is that even in outdoors & bike friendly spots like VT, trail access is fragile and can be easily taken away if the rules aren't followed.
and something about a cat and 2 chickens getting run over on the road inI think this is overcomplicating it a little. It's being framed as a sob story IMO.
You make no money on the land use - no problem.
You make money & collect fees - problem.
I believe the landowners were making money, and this is where things go to pot.
and something about a cat and 2 chickens getting run over on the road in
Interesting take, and you could be right. I guess "improvements" on the land in this case was a proxy for "making money".I think this is overcomplicating it a little. It's being framed as a sob story IMO.
You make no money on the land use - no problem.
You make money & collect fees - problem.
I believe the landowners were making money, and this is where things go to pot.
I guess "improvements" on the land in this case was a proxy for "making money".