I think 2.6 will only increase weight and rolling resistance, while delivering minimal traction benefits over a 2.35 or even a 2.5 tire.Bike is a Pivot Trail 429
Presently has 2.35” front and back. Was thinking g about trying out some 29 x 2.6” Schwalbe Nobby Nick’s, the new compound.
What do you prefer and why?
The tires are just over 300 grams heavier per tire. So a total of 600 grams, roughly 20 oz, heavier.I think 2.6 will only increase weight and rolling resistance, while delivering minimal traction benefits over a 2.35 or even a 2.5 tire.
Almost 1.5 lbs of rotational weight?!? That’s a lot. You’ll notice the difference on the trail for sure.The tires are just over 300 grams heavier per tire. So a total of 600 grams, roughly 20 oz, heavier.
The only reason I wouldn't run 2.6' tires would be if I were racing or riding with much faster people. The stability and confidence boost of 2.6' is noteworthy. Schwalbe 2.6" tires measure far less than 2.6' btw. Their new compounds are improved. If you ever slash a tire from them or any brand, ALWAYS submit a warranty claim.Bike is a Pivot Trail 429
Presently has 2.35” front and back. Was thinking g about trying out some 29 x 2.6” Schwalbe Nobby Nick’s, the new compound.
What do you prefer and why?
yup2.5 front, 2.4 rear.
2.5 front, 2.4 rear.