TheLonerider
Well-Known Member
Instead of waiting for them to "grant" access, is it possible to sue "for" access? I would think that a case could be made for rights being denied etc.? Seems like we could get JORBA and maybe IMBA involved from a legal standpoint? Or maybe this has been tried already.
Spoken as a dumb engineer, not a lawyer.
There are several tacts you can take:
1-Ban is "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable" - grounds for suit
2-Ordinance they says bans mt biking (an old ordinace they reappropriated in 95 without changing) contains a specific list of things and then the list stops. It includes only "roads, sidewalks, paths," and not blocking cars. No mention or mt biking by name or bikes on trails. since the point of such a list is to limit scope of legislation it is exclusive and therefore would not include things not listed. Some people might argue paths mean trails but they are on county maps as trails and anyway the ordinance predates the 95 ban by over ten years (imposed in 83 and never enforced against mt biking or altered after 95 to include it.) If ticketed, point to a map and say "show me the road/sidewalk/path i was on?"
3- if attempt is made to say "ordinance just allows gov't to ban biking wherever despite what it actually says" case could be made that it is overly broad.
Not a lawyer and don't play one on tv but all of these are legal arguments I got when I ran the idea by a lawyer (who is now a judge) at the beginning of the process several years ago.
Sadly instead I elected to "work with" the gov't.
Lonerider