Ken,
I haven't ridden Watchung since the new signs went up. But I don't think pointing out that there are serious questions about the "ordinance" and its applicability to mtn biking -- or how the ban was imposed -- hurts the cause. Let's face it, the county imposed the ban in a backroom meeting with no public input in '95 by unelected employees, then somehow found an old ordinance from 1983, about "roads, sidewalks, and paths" which neither mentions mtn biking, nor contains the word trail -- when the trails in question are marked on county maps as trails and not paths or sidewalks and have been for years. And then somehow figured, oh, this bans mtn biking.
Heck, in my very first OPRA response the county wrote "The freeholders did not act to ban mtn biking". So.... I guess that old ordinance wasn't intended to do so? Or it was and they just forgot to put anything about it in there -- and were wrong in their OPRA response?
Doesn't anyone else find all this strange?
Or that the county spokesman interviewed for the 2014 Star-Ledger article on the subject didn't know why mtn biking was banned, and mentioned no law or ordinance, even though overturning the ban was the whole subject of the article? Or that one ticket they admitted to giving in the last ten years from my Dec 1, 2015 OPRA request, where in place of the law or ordinance violated, the officer just wrote "bike"? Was that because even the COPS didn't know if/what the ordinance was?
I'm not saying go ride there. But I am saying as we work with the county let's not whitewash the past. We are here now because of what was done before, and a lot of it doesn't pass the damned smell test.
That said let's all work to move forward so we can ride and have fun. But let's not lie to ourselves about the validity of this policy. At best its questionable. That's the price of conducting government in the shadows.
P.S. - I'd love to hear the rationale behind hassling road bikers. My initial response to that isn't printable here, but starts with "what the ..."
Lonerider