...So would you consider yourself half fast these days?
Maybe you should get a xc bike for racing and have trail bike for enduros?Problem is, I'll be doing those on that 30lb trail bike, should be interesting
Maybe you should get a xc bike for racing and have trail bike for enduros?
I did see a large Top Fuel that some racer dude beat the shit out of for a season, enough that he broke the frame, and now he's trying to pawn it off for $5k. Puh-lease.
Are you sponsored by c-dale ?
I did see a large Top Fuel that some racer dude beat the shit out of for a season, enough that he broke the frame, and now he's trying to pawn it off for $5k. Puh-lease.
Sounds to me like a valid approach.Since I'm half fast, goal will be to beat half the field, then drink a whole beer.
YesAre you sponsored by c-dale ?
Yes, factory cannondale... Ill be showing up at the short track on Sunday with fumic in the 18 wheelerAre you sponsored by c-dale ?
.....with fumic in the 18 wheeler
Did you just accidentally make the case for the Spark??? Cuz Nino.
Yea, right? Everyone should be able to get a year-old top of the line $7k bike used for like $1,000.....
Tinker broYes, factory cannondale... Ill be showing up at the short track on Sunday with fumic in the 18 wheeler
I forgot now that Pivot has the Sl and the trail, at jungle I rode the trail (like your bike) So I havent ridden the latest Sl version. The trail version, I loved it...just couldnt see myself trying an XC race with it.You know most demo bikes are set up more for trail riding than racing. I'm sure if it was set up with an XC feel you might think differently. Stans/Pivot race team member Rose Grant use 1 & races world cup with it along with lots of XC & endurance. Pretty impressive results too.
https://rose-grant.com/racescheduleresults/
In cat 2 I would see this from time to time...cat 1...rarely..Like I can think of 2-3 guys who were outstanding downhill to the point where it might have given them a extra place or two....Especially now that so many guys are on FS bikes.. But they also trained there asses off to go faster uphill...so they were by no means slow uphill....just not as fast uphill as a few of the guys they might beat on a given day. open/pro class....honestly I cant ever think of a race where I can recall someone who is an inferior climber being competitive. Like everyone is within say 5% of each other DH speed wise...There are guys who are better, but remember were talking XC courses, not DH courses...So the terrain isnt typically challenging enough that a superior downhiller is going to put more than 5, 10, 15 seconds on an "average" guy. And if a course has enough downhill that you can put 15 seconds on someone, it will also usually have enough uphill that 15 seconds can be erased really quickly. So for me anyway...how the bike climbs, pedals, handles...utmost importance...the difference in descending between rear suspension designs...im not denying that one is better than the other, but to me, its just not that big of a deal if a DW link can give me an extra 3 seconds of DH speed in a given 30min XC lap. But im talking about something like a mach429 trail, or a habit SE, tallboy vs my scalpel...Not the turner flux...thats more xc than trail. @Kirt has one, I havent ridden it, but I would probably really like it.I haven't raced in a while, but when I did, I was pretty competitive. Anyone who is in shape and on and a fairly light bike can climb. Not everyone can descend quickly though. I used to beat guys who were in better shape than me because when the trail pointed down, they threw out the anchors.
I forgot now that Pivot has the Sl and the trail, at jungle I rode the trail (like your bike) So I havent ridden the latest Sl version. The trail version, I loved it...just couldnt see myself trying an XC race with it.
In cat 2 I would see this from time to time...cat 1...rarely..Like I can think of 2-3 guys who were outstanding downhill to the point where it might have given them a extra place or two....Especially now that so many guys are on FS bikes.. But they also trained there asses off to go faster uphill...so they were by no means slow uphill....just not as fast uphill as a few of the guys they might beat on a given day. open/pro class....honestly I cant ever think of a race where I can recall someone who is an inferior climber being competitive. Like everyone is within say 5% of each other DH speed wise...There are guys who are better, but remember were talking XC courses, not DH courses...So the terrain isnt typically challenging enough that a superior downhiller is going to put more than 5, 10, 15 seconds on an "average" guy. And if a course has enough downhill that you can put 15 seconds on someone, it will also usually have enough uphill that 15 seconds can be erased really quickly. So for me anyway...how the bike climbs, pedals, handles...utmost importance...the difference in descending between rear suspension designs...im not denying that one is better than the other, but to me, its just not that big of a deal if a DW link can give me an extra 3 seconds of DH speed in a given 30min XC lap. But im talking about something like a mach429 trail, or a habit SE, tallboy vs my scalpel...Not the turner flux...thats more xc than trail. @Kirt has one, I havent ridden it, but I would probably really like it.
I am...the czar is the one I was thinking about.And I think your confusing the Flux with the Czar