I concur; however, we don't really have the rim scorching descents out here you might in other parts of the country/world so in reality they would probably not kill you around here. Lots of people have logged a lot of miles on chinese carbon clinchers (CCC's), certainly with some documented failures but by no means epidemic IMO. I just don't see much need for carbon clinchers--in addition to some marginal safety risk, they are heavy compared to toobies.
I race on plastic tubulars but if I'm JRA or training then a nice wide alu clincher with sensible spoke count checks all the boxes for me. H+Son Archetype weighs about the same as a 45mm CCC and a Pacenti SL 23 weighs about the same as a 35mm deep CCC. Pick your poison.
If I'm playing the odds, I'll take my chances on a slighty less aero aluminum clincher. Statistics favors the prepared. I suppose you could say Pick you Poisson.
I'm assuming your opinion changes with disks?
Pacenti SL23 here w/ rim brakes. Seemed like the best option when I put them together and still that way with rim brakes. The BHS rims/spokes/hubs deal packages can be quite worth it.
If I was doing a disk road bike (which I doubt I ever would) the carbon rims seem to be a good option I would think.